- Al Mohler finds Spurgeon's words of warning about the emerging doctrinal compromise of the 1870s "as prophetic today as when they were first written."
- Brad at "The Watcher Chronicles" agrees that there's a limit to what we can legitimately do in the name of 1 Corinthians 9:20-21. Brad's previous post provided a fitting example of what going too far looks like: a church that staged a boxing match as an elaborate "sermon illustration."
- Pecadillo thinks his dog is better than your dog. You know what? I agree with him.
- Doug Wilson expands on the concept of "authenticity." He has a typically pithy observation: "These lockstep rebels have no idea that they are wearing uniforms." He also has a droll suggestion about how to respond to people who think piercing their faces makes them "counterculture."
- Scott Hill, one of the dawgs at "Fide-o," tries his hand at comic-book design. Well, he won't win any awards for the graphic treatment of the text, but the copy itself is pretty funny. I'd definitely hire Scott as a writer if he were jobless and willing to work really cheap.
- Ashley Langford thought everyone's comments on yesterday's post were good.
- Donnie Hiltz has figured out the secret of Pecadillo's chiseled good looks.
- Jeff Jones recalls how the Biblezine parodies we posted here in July reduced him to tears. Of course, that series touched on the same issue we've been talking about this week: making Christianity cool enough for the kids.
- Parke wonders if PyroManiac signals a fundamentalist renaissance. We'll take that as a compliment. But if you seriously want to watch the rising tide of fundamentalism's next wave, check out the blogroll over at Sharperiron.org. And be sure you read Kevin Bauder's blog, Nos Sobrii.
- Andrew Jones of "TallSkinnyKiwi" fame gives us some of the best publicity we've ever had, with some encouraging comments about the graphic look and the general impact of PyroManiac.
- . . . and speaking of good publicity, Tim Challies has a new daily feature linking to some daily highlights from all over the blogosphere.
- Timmy at "Provocations and Pantings" draws an interesting connection between my recent remarks on the cardinal points of Christian doctrine and a great article by Al Mohler on "Theological Triage." He also mentions that I mentioned that he mentioned me. (Is there a limit on reciprocal BlogSpots?)
- Matt Brown of "SwineBass" commits a Freudian slip.
- Ant Adams revisits the Harry Potter debate.
- Jonathan Moorhead borrows a picture that premiered here. (I have this uneasy feeling that one's going to make the rounds in the blogosphere. Let's keep it away from Abanes, though, huh?)
- Scott McLare, "The Crusty Curmudgeon," who over the years has probably made me laugh more and harder than anyone else in cyberspace, gives me points for buttering him up.
- Cindy Swanson likes the way I've categorized her in the blogroll. (Oh. So that's what "convivial" means? I think I had it confused with another word.) No. I'm kidding. Cindy used to participate in an online forum I often read. It was a rather rowdy menagerie of fighting fundamentalists. She was the only genuinely friendly person in a mix of thugs, rogues, miscreants, and potential serial killers. When you can exude grace in a place like that, it really counts for something. (I ought to try to hire her to referee my comments threads.)
- Steve Hemmeke reminds us that the gospel ought to change the world, not vice versa.
- Tony Hayling liked the eyeball graphic I posted yesterday.
- Brad Williams ponders the mysteries of Internet jargon.
- Mark Jurries at "Gimmie Back My Bullets" is disturbed by the utter lack of any assurance emerging-type church leaders express when it comes to matters of vital truth.
- Kevin Jones at "The Reluctant Puritan" was so distraught when I missed him in my last BlogSpotting post that he wrote a poem about it.
- Adrian Warnock noticed the poem and purloined it.
- Arjay Stevens credits me with introducing him to Spurgeon.
- Ryan DeBarr found "The Emerging Conversation" comic book "hilarious on a few different levels." I think that's a good thing, though I suppose it's possible one or more levels of that hilarity came at my expense.
- Eddie Gonzalez at "Reformatus Sum" liked my reply to "Savage Countenance".
- Matt Gumm thinks he's on the verge of greatness. You know what they say about the fine line between genius and insanity.
- Finally, Frank Turk checks his stats carefully. Be sure you visit him today. Tell him I sent you.
Blogtool Update:
- The Truth Laid Bare suddenly rediscovered a bunch of links to PyroManiac that had gone missing. It's still not working correctly, though. I've seen several bloggers' references to the vacillating way it accounts for links. Almost everyone's numbers seem to go up and down wildly every day. And some pretty odd blogs keep popping in and out of the top rankings. I've concluded it's giving me stats and other data that are practically worthless. I understand it's only a part-time hobby for NZ Bear. No wonder he's had a hard time keeping up with the explosion of blogs. It's frankly amazing that the TTLB concept works at all without lots of staff and corporate resources to maintain it 24/7.
- IceRocket is still very reliable. It always returns results rather than error messages, and that's good. But it doesn't seem to search as many blogs or index as frequently as the other two search engines I use regularly.
- Technorati finally seems to be fixed. It's been more than a week since I got the "server busy" message. Let's hope they keep it running. It still seems slow to index new posts, but it's at least 400 percent better than 2 weeks ago. If it works for another week or so, I'll put the Technorati link back on my blog template.
- Google's Blog Search, as you'd expect, is already very good and getting better every day. It seems to update and index new posts more frequently than the others. I predict its performance is going to be very hard to beat. But hey, am I the only one who thinks all the tools related to Blogger.com (Google) have ugly interfaces? Between the three major search engines I've linked to here, the Blogger's Blog Search is far and away the ugliest. (My favorite is the slightly retro look of IceRocket.)
15 comments:
To increase the speed at which Technorati and IceRocket get to your new posts, you can just visit their "Ping" site. Once you bookmark the link to the ping related to you site, all you have to do is visit that ping link and it knows you have a new post. So for example, IceRocket's would be http://www.icerocket.com/c?p=ping and you would then enter your blog. When you hit submit, then bookmark the resultant page. Now when you go back to that page, it automatically pings them to let them know you posted. Other fancier blogging software actually allows you to integrate this to your code, but us poor saps on blogger must rely on doing it manually, or waiting for new indexing.
The fact that IceRocket works well doesn't come as a surprize to me, as IIRC it is owned by Mark Cuban (owner of NBA's Dallas Mavericks). Technorati certainly has been better, but still isn't what it could be. I'm sure it's an issue of funding as much as anything, as I can't imagine revenue streams being all that large for something like that (yet).
Big Chris
Because I said so blog
Phil,
It's been a while since the whole Mohler/alcohol thing blew up. You have probably noticed some of my Anti-Mohlerite posts as well.
It would be good of you to address the alcohol question that Mohler raised at Reformissionary's blogsite:
http://www.stevekmccoy.com/reformissionary/2005/09/sbts_alcohol_an.html
Ah, Phil, one of my favorite WWII posters. Thanks.
Oh, and I like this one also.
Hey, I was thinking "convivial" meant something like "fun to be around," and I was fine with that, too!
Pyromaniac, do those liberal do-gooders over at Google really need more publicity?? Come on!
Regarding blog search engines, I agree that the Blogger interface leaves much to be desired. I prefer the Google GUI myself- same results as Blogger, but better looking.
Greg Linscott
SharperIron
Is that wrong? Can someone tell me what that's wrong?
It's not wrong to want to know where your stats are coming from. It would be self-deceptive to say I don't care if anyone is reading. And most importantly: it proves to me what a great friend you are, Phil.
Not that I need proof, mind you. I'm just saving up for the day that someone tries to tell me, "That Phil Johnson is no friend." Anyone trying that stunt has about 2,000 hits on my blog to contend with. In that respect, you are a better friend than my wife.
Just don't tell her I said that.
And no, that last comment is not defensive.
You made me tear up again, you know. Phil, where do you dig these covers up from? Was this one a Johnson original?
Maybe you should trademark your spoofs. You never know if some graphic artist from Thomas Nelson might happen upon your blog, and think, "Hey! That's brilliant!" (He'd be right, though he wouldn't quite mean it the way most of your readers would...)
Be careful, else you may be surprised to see one of those things actually land on a bookstore shelf someday.
"My life verse James 4:9"
Priceless.
As someone who was very much into the punk and metal scene I have to say that piece of ironic wit is very pertinenet to me.
Rock & Roll and in particular punk and metal are predominantly driven by discontent. I could not reconcile that with my faith and salvation. I am abundantly content now thanks to Him!
After several years of not listening to any secular music, a kind of detox if you will, I every now and then do listen to the likes of Metallica or Social Distortion with a very different view. I can listen and enjoy the music but insofar as it helps me to one; reeber what I was saved from, and two; engender a more fervent love for the lost as I listen to them crying for help and satisfaction in everything but what they really need.
That said, I could never desire to "get back into the scene" in dres or otherwise. That man is dead.
I DO listen to some Christian pop/rock though. When I was a teen all Christian contemporary was either
A. Good music with terrible/heretical lyrics.
B. Terrible musically with Ok to good lyrics.
These days there are some good ones though that I think of first fr the messaether lyrics convey and their musical skill, or style second. But you have to look hard.
Although it took a while musicaly I predominantly prefer old hymns now simply due to content. I don't care what style it is as long as it is properly portaying God and the Christian walk.
one salient oversight thinks that Phil should address the alcohol question. I'll drink to that!
I was confused by this blog post to tell you the truth. What is the point in all the linking?
Hey Phil, I haven't been around the blogosphere for a little while, so I wasn't sure if you had noticed that Michael Haykin has started a blog? Would that blogdom had more minds like this!
Phil, what do you consider cheap?
Love the Gothpel for Girls bit. :) Bob Beeman (of Sanctuary, The Rock & Roll Refuge), my former pastor and one who discipled me as a new Christian, would get a kick out of this.
Post a Comment